|
回复 9# 咕噜
5 E* |- u8 f4 q8 \3 s* ?' C6 k! r, P& g- m0 i$ S9 O
How am I supposed to have seen him? Even if I hypothetically have "seen" him, I ....... Oh Crap......That's already a spurious causal relation, no matter what results I want to draw from my fore mentioned assumption...7 g/ P) k- c4 z$ D; p3 ~7 n8 p' f5 W+ Z
: y8 a- e) y) m
Boy... that was complicated....2 L( B$ g( P1 u) c+ Y% H J
+ W* a' k4 n5 h0 Y- m. H
7 Y* ]5 V: S' T, `2 `8 J# G# h% O. q
7 y0 X H& _$ \+ ?/ ^# _
How I hate German and love English.... |
|